From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 08:49:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5931916A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:49:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0E343D60 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:49:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no (amidala.datadok.no [194.54.103.98]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2G8ltBM073380 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:47:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:46:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Davour's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:39:16 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <86psy0nfl7.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW or pf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:49:09 -0000 Andreas Davour writes: > So, the base systems ships with two firewalls? Three, actually - ipfw, ipf and pf. There's a brief explanation why in the handbook at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-apps.html I prefer pf myself, but which one to use is really down to personal preference. I'd recommend following the Handbook's advice and do a bit of reading and experimenting. I hope to get around to updating my pf tutorial soonish (see http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/ if you're interested - or http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/no/ if you prefer the Norwegian version) -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"