From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  2 15:15:37 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC17C16A403
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 May 2006 15:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from karagodov@gmail.com)
Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.177])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F3743D48
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 May 2006 15:15:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from karagodov@gmail.com)
Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t32so3103375pyc
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 02 May 2006 08:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	b=LPB12aaMFuJwJJoZORZn1AeZrPBeGe3Erob5fL9dKW5RU6a7YlUfUomn9ZY1xwY2sMV1mNhCW31PbVY/b60evGbikvRlaf0dAUVabxiFwTlBknLelidXbl3VqrFF5Ewaqra+th8cr/qpj4Qm9NbnnpwtpgMB6kkUdEvLZiZ2JFU=
Received: by 10.35.17.8 with SMTP id u8mr1096442pyi;
	Tue, 02 May 2006 08:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.135.15 with HTTP; Tue, 2 May 2006 08:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c7aff4ef0605020815o397fcb65ue6fcc81994e10c8f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:15:36 +0400
From: "Alexey Karagodov" <karagodov@gmail.com>
To: "Mikhail Teterin" <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <200605021101.57778@aldan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <200605011604.26507.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
	<20060501220414.GA74865@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
	<20060502095954.GA693@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
	<200605021101.57778@aldan>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:54:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: current@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>,
	Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, stable@freebsd.org,
	Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:15:38 -0000

workaround i use: 32-bit jail on amd64 system ... not so bad ...

2006/5/2, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>:
>
> On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> =3D But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead
> =3D of a hand-tweaked assembler core. I read Mikhail's comment as meaning
> =3D that it is possible to build non-trivial 32-bit executables on amd64,
> =3D there's just work still needed to make this work as a general case.
>
> Thanks, Peter. You are correct, that was my meaning.
>
> Interestingly, the assembler-optimized 32-bit routines made lame slower
> than
> the native 64-bit code in my experiments (one may wish to compare
> assembler
> vs. C lame on i386 too). But it all *worked*, which was the point...
>
>        -mi
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>