From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 19 21:45:44 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC38B71E;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:45:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from monthadar@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.212.172])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E965979;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:45:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so5429614wid.5
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:45:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=r93k93PMSjDmSmx7qMhYRMezCojaEj88gYKPODBtVIs=;
 b=dVJdeEDIYONWKww/U0jrGZiGyimhB2SnY6Ir9aVKaRVufO6L23Hl9dQbO6u8KVQo+o
 XRkwJPSK5ETvzJgXW86td0v6t7aZR77EBs9olESYPGr1SDD/k4IQPnE0G7ok9OMUacXr
 tKFRaC9oTkGHoD7Tz27AczQFIhayhePNJYvs96SzEb+nXfLxegm/i1ykQDTOFP3yiSqV
 uFhoRqgmucFB3Wmr0+NWjHRUZO1AnD5CXV+nDVphr2abhpaUuV8XhWRd1369+gKzSmaT
 8rCqC91HYsYLSSD+5yjj3zq97euCn7IYSLCvH0kzmUPwbpNIC4ba2l7/Qa8ICrFKoaWf
 opzg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.75.177 with SMTP id d17mr28743416wiw.16.1361310343143;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.196.15 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:45:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonVGqBiRBJScjKNG4KmRu=_c+4d-rdt0a-vcjBvd2Mitw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFZ_MYJjV=5FtEmWkO7rRBtAuvn2R0Ec=O0ojhPxBfcBuLRUJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmonAXBxuD51y-j5PEt4uGHO_EX15C3inj9wTmR+Jnb21LA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFZ_MYLswF_3OvEg=uc5GXUAi=EipXmqj-cAWjRC9xi93V-R1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmon+uSKwkEkeiUsC=Gh+k=uVpZdXM5kTKtP_cmfBD0nwjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmomMnZ7EM=bgS9NpM_pYDaLQxFg5k2vd7vrdEa4oYx3XNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmo=g5F06dY0p9mOYxY_+h1bLNdQ7+ukQToU5eb4E+NuBuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+sBSoJZ0uQm_M_OZ-eOSCVFtvu7DeboE28JNbLrY15BTcRRhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmo=sJ3Qh8VU+99bNr-a3wm5E6e9c=O_qy3w-6ERkVGj5MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmomHCz2nEd-GEh2JKoYbfAdsG0xYbAt=j-BqW6D5jHxMeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmon=SdO66j99dEPT1uSqhmJoNPYVexy-PT0__XTX3My+TQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+sBSoKpHGSYQBM3xvmOEMayq0iXi9L6O5UjUXUqw=1-bknxnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmok7GjrB3K3wLrkN1y4+NCEgb+LYd2FMpyAuXDrK8hZr6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+sBSo+_K6s==AVik+fOCir4fTmrjebaXiwvoZyBHmqpKNKT6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmonVGqBiRBJScjKNG4KmRu=_c+4d-rdt0a-vcjBvd2Mitw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:45:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+sBSoLEEnUWAcrbTUqcVGDdwRZsUkWnVd78LzRqGQjAy6Rvvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] serialising net80211 TX
From: Monthadar Al Jaberi <monthadar@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca>, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
 tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:45:44 -0000

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 19 February 2013 09:44, Monthadar Al Jaberi <monthadar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have tested between two meshSTAand run iperf UDP until I get close
>> to getting lost packets.
>>
>> Current FreeBSD (r246983): 17 Mbits/
>> Current FreeBSD (r246983) + with your patch: 15 Mbit/s
>>
>> Good news no panic! But looks like a bit slower. I should add I have
>> noticed before that mesh is slower than other modes.
>
> This is with witness, right?

No I forgot that part, will try again :)

>
> You can do some lock profiling to see whether there's any locking
> issues creeping up.
>
> and yeah, mesh will be a bit slower, at least until we figure out how
> to enable aggressive mode properly for it and IBSS modes.
>
>
>
> Adrian



-- 
Monthadar Al Jaberi