From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:22:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D5C16A41F; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CDC43D45; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id ECE7FACC59; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:22:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:22:39 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Dario Freni Message-ID: <20050726202239.GJ46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <42E6903D.1040107@freesbie.org> <20050726200214.GH46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <42E697E2.2050000@freesbie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sRX2FdEyTtTKLbqH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42E697E2.2050000@freesbie.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 Cc: geom@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: geom_vol_cd9660 class X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:22:41 -0000 --sRX2FdEyTtTKLbqH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:06:58PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote: +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: +> > What's wrong with glabel(8)? +>=20 +> Honestly, I didn't know it before. Looking into NanoBSD code I saw it +> use GEOM_VOL, so I started investigate on geom_vol_ffs and write this +> tiny class. Agreeing with Andreas Kohn on current@: +>=20 +> +> But, the really important question is: why is there geom_vol_ffs and +> geom_label? Apparently I wasn't the only one who did not see +> geom_label :) +> That's actually my fault. I wanted to remove geom_vol_ffs long time ago to not confuse the users. To not make your work useless, could you verify iso9660 part of geom_label? Maybe I missed something there. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --sRX2FdEyTtTKLbqH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5puPForvXbEpPzQRAtE5AJ9aAGCRkrEiZXjrM4XX3NqZeuaHfQCffi+Q 6KBjFGG9VZS2Xmwv1yT2LcI= =nVLI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sRX2FdEyTtTKLbqH--