Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:31:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195117] [maintainer update] ports-mgmt/portrac: Mark BROKEN on versions earlier than 10. Message-ID: <bug-195117-13-30lOB5mn52@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-195117-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-195117-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195117 John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marino@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- The premise that pkg is a FreeBSD 10 tool is wrong - I think you know that. Secondly, pkg is not something that a port cares about. They are independent. Thirdly: We are telling you want the problem is. You have to set USES=compiler. Your response is "I can't figure that out, so let's just limit the port to the latest release". We would prefer this port be fixed properly -- not limited because limited for artificial reasons. There are good reasons for limiting a port to specific releases, but this isn't a good one IMO. I also don't get the reference to QT5. Obviously if the port requires QT5 and QT5 didn't build on FreeBSD9 (it does) then this port would get skipped due to a missing dependency, so no need to mask it specifically. And this is a ports-mgmt tool! That's are the last type of ports that should be limited. Please set USES+= compiler:c++11-lib or whatever the callout is. Bartek can check it with poudriere if you don't have that set up. I don't see a persuasive argument to neglect supported FreeBSD releases here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195117-13-30lOB5mn52>