From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 19 07:03:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA06952 for current-outgoing; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.wup.de (ns.wup.de [149.237.200.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA06860 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 07:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by mail.wup.de (8.8.6/8.8.7) id OAA05477; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 14:41:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19970819144130.08010@wup.de> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 14:41:30 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Satoshi Asami Cc: itojun@itojun.org, andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: another make world compile problem, the previous is fixed References: <639.871826920@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp> <199708191013.DAA20187@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.79 In-Reply-To: <199708191013.DAA20187@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Tue, Aug 19, 1997 at 03:13:18AM -0700 X-phone: Wiechers & Partner +49 2173 3964 161 X-fax: Wiechers & Partner +49 2173 3964 222 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, Aug 19, 1997 at 03:13:18AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * I'm not familiar with /usr/src/usr.bin/vi policy, but... > * is it really necessery to compile in tcl interpreter into > * /usr/bin/vi? > * (I'm familiar with nvi itself) > > IMO, no (regardless of NOTCL setting). If people want a bloated vi > with tcl/tk/perl/whatever support built in, they can use the ports. To second that: Isn't there a vi on the fixit floppy ? I think, if tcl support get's compiled into the standard vi then there could arise space problems or am I wrong ? -- Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH phone: +49 2173 3964 161 Support Unix - Andreas Klemm fax: +49 2173 3964 222 An der alten Ziegelei 2 mail1: andreas.klemm@wup.de D-40789 Monheim mail2: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG