From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 22:06:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A06016A590 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83AAF44584 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:45:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 29821 invoked by uid 399); 11 Dec 2006 21:46:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Dec 2006 21:46:44 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <457DD1C2.5000802@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:46:42 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Eden References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R -> 6.1R X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:06:54 -0000 Greg Eden wrote: > Hello > > I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and > buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number of > Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes. One is a > HP DL360g3, the other is a HP DL380g3. Both have a pair of 2.8GHz Xeons > with a SMP kernel. It would be quite useful at this point if you could update a box or two to the RELENG_6_2 code base so that we can see if this problem is solved in the latest release candidate. If it is, your problem is solved, and if it's not, you're a lot closer to the point where we can usefully assist you. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection