From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Oct 29 11:19:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.oblivion.bg (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A85B37B4C5 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:19:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1929 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Oct 2000 19:18:56 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:18:56 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Bill Fumerola Cc: "James E. Housley" , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/tcpcat Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20001029211855.A500@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Fumerola , "James E. Housley" , ports@freebsd.org References: <200010291223.EAA04156@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001029140801.X37870@jade.chc-chimes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001029140801.X37870@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from billf@chimesnet.com on Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:08:01PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:08:01PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: > [ not meant as an attack on James ] > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 04:23:53AM -0800, James E. Housley wrote: > > > Log: > > New Port: net/tcpcat > > A simple utility for sending/receiving data over a TCP or a Unix-domain socket > > How many of these programs are we going to have in ports.. I can think of 3 right > now that do the exact same thing as this one.. To quote from tcpcat's homepage (WWW: http://www.gusnet.cx/proj/tcpcat/) When I wrote this I was not aware of netcat. netcat essentailly does the same thing as tcpcat but has been around a lot longer and is more geared towards port scanning. Netcat also has connected UDP support (whatever that's worth). Tcpcat is more user friendly, supports AF_UNIX domain sockets, has a throughput meter, supports OSes without a unified socket/filedescriptor address space (BeOS) in a diminished capacity, is built with autoconf and some other stuff. Tcpcat does not use any code from netcat. So, yes, tcpcat is like netcat and friends in some respects, but it does add some functionality, too. Also, netcat has some problems when reading from a pipe - sometimes it fails to detect end-of-input, and just hangs there, waiting for never. tcpcat does not have this problem. G'luck, Peter -- Thit sentence is not self-referential because "thit" is not a word. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message