From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 10:28:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FCB16A4CE for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:28:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cegetel.net (mf01.sitadelle.com [212.94.174.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B8443D46 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:28:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jspedron@club-internet.fr) Received: from [172.16.142.1] (213-223-184-201.dti.cegetel.net [213.223.184.201]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1671637B90; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:28:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41763DEB.6090606@club-internet.fr> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:28:59 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041006 X-Accept-Language: fr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <417538B9.7070001@club-internet.fr> <41755FAF.8080300@colleduc.ee> <20041019191941.GB1376@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <20041019191941.GB1376@frontfree.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig08F58C418BAFD3F9C06B13DA" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: Kalev Lember Subject: Re: Read-only ReiserFS support for FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:28:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig08F58C418BAFD3F9C06B13DA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Xin LI wrote: > ReiserFS, however, *does* provide better performance when dealing with zillions > of small files. I don't want to debate whether a well-designed system should > actually utilize this, but I believe it would be beneficial to bring some > different ideas we can take as reference :-) > > My intention is, however, to write a new (or to improve our existing) > filesystem which is optimized for large files (e.g. databases), while > providing "fairly good" performance when dealing with many small files. I agree this could benefit to our filesystem. The user could also have the choice between a few solutions. -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron http://www.dumbbell-fr.net/ --------------enig08F58C418BAFD3F9C06B13DA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBdj3ra+xGJsFYOlMRAuv5AJ9ux49gEFBQE4vgZHZFh722gqYPywCfezOr QiNHP6g60cGdd6DsZK0zReE= =DzXD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig08F58C418BAFD3F9C06B13DA--