From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jul 19 00:56:50 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA12987
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 00:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA12982;
          Sat, 19 Jul 1997 00:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id RAA31825; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 17:53:16 +1000
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 17:53:16 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199707190753.RAA31825@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: current@freebsd.org
Subject: mount_cd9660 binary compatibility broken
Cc: dfr@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The WebNFS changes broke binary compatibilty of at least cd9660 and mfs
by adding a field to `struct export_args'.  The iso_args and mfs_args
structs have important fields following their export_args field.  ufs
doesn't have this problem because `struct ufs_args' doesn't have anything
following the export_args field.

I want to drop binary compatibility with 2.2 mount utilities soon but
don't want to have multiple incompatibilities.

Bruce