From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 21 20:20:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6142B37B405 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta04ps.bigpond.com (mta04ps.bigpond.com [144.135.25.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0931E43ED8 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:20:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au) Received: from CPE-61-9-164-106.vic.bigpond.net.au ([144.135.25.72]) by mta04ps.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta04ps Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id H7I6PX00.BFI for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 14:20:21 +1000 Received: from CPE-203-51-160-253.vic.bigpond.net.au ([203.51.160.253]) by PSMAM02.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 80/13999866); 22 Dec 2002 14:20:21 Received: (from root@localhost) by CPE-61-9-164-106.vic.bigpond.net.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) id gBM4JxB24165; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:19:59 +1100 From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200212220419.PAA21619@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> Subject: Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0 In-Reply-To: <3E04A746.20C5C72E@mindspring.com> To: Terry Lambert Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:19:51 +1100 Cc: Sergey Mokryshev , Vallo Kallaste , Sam Leffler , Hiten Pandya , Darren Reed , current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In some email I received from Terry Lambert, sie wrote: > Sergey Mokryshev wrote: > > > I'm really not a fan of "NO_PFIL_HOOKS" as an option. > > > > I'm not talking about NO_PFIL_HOOKS but "options PFIL_HOOKS" in GENERIC. > > Too many people may foot shoot themselves trying to upgrade from 4-STABLE > > to 5.0. > > If you make them non-optional, which is what started this thread, > then you *are* talking about having to add an option in to get > rid of them. Seriously, Terry, how many "NO_foo" options exist, today ? > I understand that people all want their pet software to run out > of the box without modification. I'm not the one who wants that, it's people who USE FreeBSD. You remember users, don't you Terry ? :) > > > Probably the correct thing to do is to wire in ipfilter as a > > > Netgraph module. > > > > AFAIK Solaris, HP-UX and others lack Netgraph support, but support pfil. > > They support Streams, instead. Same ecological niche. That's STREAMS thank you very much! I'll talk more on that point in another email. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message