From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 18:22:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BCC16A40D for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [83.12.228.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B5C13C4C1 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l21IMX7e024583; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:22:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id l21IMWWt024580; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:22:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:22:32 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Steve Franks In-Reply-To: <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070301192109.A24369@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions Subject: Re: defrag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:22:35 -0000 > How come I never hear defrag come up as a topic, and can't find > anything related to defrag in the ports tree? Is it really not an > issue on UFS? Can someone point me to an explantion if so? unless you'll keep your filesystem always near-full it's not an issue. POSSIBLY it could gain few percent improvement with defrag, after long time of usage, but no more. there is AFAIK not defrag for UFS. backup+restore will be defrag