From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:37:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3095B106564A; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EDA8FC12; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:1d3e:4d27:b4ee:e1e2]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8E0294AC2D; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:37:57 +0400 (MSK) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:37:51 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <524849865.20120112143751@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <4F0EB625.3000905@FreeBSD.org> References: <1379921442.20120112133112@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F0EADE1.9070803@FreeBSD.org> <1699441022.20120112140525@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F0EB625.3000905@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE / NetGraph interaction broken somwhere between r227874 and r229818 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:37:59 -0000 Hello, Andriy. You wrote 12 =FF=ED=E2=E0=F0=FF 2012 =E3., 14:29:57: > Well, I mostly meant things like uptime, load level and pattern, etc. These are identical too -- freshly boot system, same load (torrent client on other box), only load -- traffic, as it is router, same upload/download speeds and peer counts in torrent client. > But what mav says makes sense. I'm rebuilding system with ULE and KSTACK_PAGES=3D6 (3 is default on i386) now. > Also I remember seeing some very old reports about some strange issues wi= th > SCHED_ULE and dummynet. > Some links that I found: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/046332.html > http://dadv.livejournal.com/139366.html#cutid1 > Given the last link, I wonder if binding the ng_queue thread to a particu= lar CPU > would change anything. It is AMD Geode 500MHz. There is no ``particular CPU,'' there is only The CPU with The Core :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov