Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:37:51 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE / NetGraph interaction broken somwhere between r227874 and r229818 Message-ID: <524849865.20120112143751@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <4F0EB625.3000905@FreeBSD.org> References: <1379921442.20120112133112@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F0EADE1.9070803@FreeBSD.org> <1699441022.20120112140525@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F0EB625.3000905@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Andriy. You wrote 12 =FF=ED=E2=E0=F0=FF 2012 =E3., 14:29:57: > Well, I mostly meant things like uptime, load level and pattern, etc. These are identical too -- freshly boot system, same load (torrent client on other box), only load -- traffic, as it is router, same upload/download speeds and peer counts in torrent client. > But what mav says makes sense. I'm rebuilding system with ULE and KSTACK_PAGES=3D6 (3 is default on i386) now. > Also I remember seeing some very old reports about some strange issues wi= th > SCHED_ULE and dummynet. > Some links that I found: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/046332.html > http://dadv.livejournal.com/139366.html#cutid1 > Given the last link, I wonder if binding the ng_queue thread to a particu= lar CPU > would change anything. It is AMD Geode 500MHz. There is no ``particular CPU,'' there is only The CPU with The Core :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?524849865.20120112143751>