From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 10 21: 4:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wcn4.wcnet.net (mail.wcnet.net [216.88.248.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8CC14CB7; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 21:03:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jestess@wcnet.net) Received: from wcnet.net [216.88.253.163] by wcn4.wcnet.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.05) id A9B32D32027E; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:03:47 -0600 Message-ID: <387AB942.92C7C2E5@wcnet.net> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:01:54 -0600 From: John Estess Organization: compulsive or none, depending on the day X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?) References: <20000110205710.D98651@relay.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > And the triva question is why was there 1BSD, 2BSD, 3BSD, and then the switch > to 4.0BSD - 4.4BSD. For an asymptotic approach to 5? The unreachable goal... Little did they know the next release was to be 4.4.1. -- _/ _/_/_/ || John Estess _/ _/ _/_/ || jestess@wcnet.net _/_/_/ _/_/_/ || To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message