From owner-freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 07:47:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF55EB01181 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 07:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAFE1F9F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 07:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CB880B0117F; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 07:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perl@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E7FB0117E for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 07:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8DF1F9E for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 07:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1amzE8-000OAZ-Mg; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 09:47:12 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:47:12 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Daniel O'Connor Cc: perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl vendor directory Message-ID: <20160404074712.GI35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <2490D243-A6AF-453A-A7AA-E7246CD57639@gsoft.com.au> <20160404071742.GH35640@home.opsec.eu> <12CA1FE7-B106-4015-8E07-C8082F3E7BE6@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12CA1FE7-B106-4015-8E07-C8082F3E7BE6@gsoft.com.au> X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 07:47:14 -0000 Hi! > Is there a reason _not_ set the vendor variables? I've never heard about vendor variables before, so I don't know. Can you elaborate on what they do in general and in ZoneMinder ? > If other ports have the same work around it seems like this would > reduce the number of modifications over all.. I have no idea how those vendor variables are handled, I've never stumbled upon them in the past. I would very much appreciate links that allow me to catch up on the topic. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !