From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 13 09:20:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB4DEEF for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 991481C2C for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1D9K2Qa018173 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s1D9K2mX018172; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:20:02 GMT Message-Id: <201402130920.s1D9K2mX018172@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Subject: Re: docs/186608: typo in 'ctime(3) man page X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jamie Landeg-Jones List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:20:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/186608; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jamie Landeg-Jones To: jamie@dyslexicfish.net, bjk@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/186608: typo in 'ctime(3) man page Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:13 +0000 Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > I think that the current ~upstream for the tzcode is supposed to be > https://github.com/eggert/tz/ , but I haven't checked particularly > recently. (There was some excitement involving a legal action, etc., so > it had gone away and/or moved.) That said, I don't see a BUGS section at > all in the newctime.3 in that repo, and I also don't see the erroneous > line you quote in the history of that repo, so ... I'm not sure what > happened. Ahh. OK! Thanks. > > I hope I don't get the reputation for most anal contributor :-( > > Definitely not! ha! You haven't seen my other PR's :-) > PR is fine, it gives us a place to look when we need to find things. ok, thanks. > Thanks for pointing it out. I'll try to think about what the best route > to a fix is. no rush. hee hee. p.s. my next PRs (2 pending) are 'proper' bug fixes! cheers, Jamie