From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 20:12:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEB516A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:12:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3670043D41 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:12:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B761F0E5; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:12:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 1A3126149; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:12:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:12:29 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Marc Olzheim , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050425201229.GA92995@stack.nl> References: <20050425101008.GA57542@stack.nl> <20050425135044.GD769@empiric.icir.org> <20050425152314.GB58044@stack.nl> <20050425165041.GA71899@stack.nl> <20050425192949.GE769@empiric.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050425192949.GE769@empiric.icir.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: preadv() / pwritev() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:12:32 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:29:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > More like this then... >=20 > Yep, something like that! Thanks, though I may not have time to commit > this at the moment. :-( Then should I file a PR after someone tells me what kind of naming scheme they'd rather have than dopreadv() and dopwritev() :-P ? Or should I combine all of the 4 read functions together (as well as all of the 4 write functions) ? The current patch is against 6-CURRENT, but applies almost perfectly against 5-STABLE as well, and works for me. ;-) Marc --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbU8tezjnobFOgrERAi4pAJ9Zctw0SgnvV5w1dps/QaVse4G9BgCgu+q9 IiTCnS/o+942ygF4ilLmmj8= =4kTl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--