From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon Feb 8 08:00:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E73AA0EB5 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49351B1C for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@mu.org) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro-2.local (unknown [IPv6:2601:645:8001:cee1:8d8c:acfd:b4fe:750c]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71A07345A965 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 00:00:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Macbook donation (wireless needs fixing) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <56B64086.4090806@freebsd.org> <56B7BA1E.2020407@freebsd.org> <56B82A2F.7050009@freebsd.org> From: Alfred Perlstein Message-ID: <56B84B22.1030707@mu.org> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 00:00:34 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:00:39 -0000 On 2/7/16 11:14 PM, NGie Cooper wrote: >> On Feb 7, 2016, at 21:39, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> >> On 2/7/16 4:24 PM, Brandon Vincent wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>>> Oh, strange, let me see why my macbook4,1 doesn't work with this... maybe >>>> it's just not loaded by default? >>> You'll need the firmware contained in ports/net/bwi-firmware-kmod. >> This can't be part of the base distribution? > Not sure of the details, but it looks like no: > > NO_PACKAGE= this is a modified version of a restricted firmware > > :(… Yes, but last time it was someone being overly zealous about some other firmware that turned out to be fine. Why is this firmware restricted? How are others distributing it? Seems silly. -Alfred