From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 00:45:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD162106564A; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAA614DD8D; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E656D30.3040905@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:45:36 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaud Lacombe References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: No IPFW binary compat across versions ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:45:38 -0000 On 09/05/2011 17:18, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > From my point of view, I should be able to run a FreeBSD 9.0 kernel > (when released) on top of a FreeBSD 5 userland without such issues. Unfortunately your expectation is completely unrealistic. We do our best to maintain backward compatibility but sometimes improvements require breaking the KBI/ABI. Also, we have never supported running a kernel from RELENG_N on anything older than the latest version of RELENG_{N-1}. hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/