Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 May 2004 15:30:07 -0400
From:      Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
To:        src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/enigma enigma.1 
Message-ID:  <20040514193008.503382081E@citi.umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman, Fri, 14 May 2004 15:00:52 EDT

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  You may want to amend it into the 21st century regarding what the 
  alternatives are for "real" encryption -- perhaps replace all of the 
  mentioned alternatives with openssl(1), or just replace bdes(1)...

You might also want to clarify that the encryption is a simple single rotor,
not the more difficult (but still unsafe) German military Enigma.

Someone should also fix the bdes(1) man page, which still says, "DES is
considered a very strong cryptosystem" and "key search attacks... are very
expensive and time-consuming."  Just taking out "very" in both places might
be enough.  And add a pointer to openssl(1) for something stronger.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040514193008.503382081E>