Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:05:24 -0800
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        "nwhitehorn@freebsd.org" <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org>, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: e77cf2a4ab32 - main - Restore /boot/efi to mtree.
Message-ID:  <656E3D05-11B6-437B-B171-4894811A70CB@yahoo.com>
References:  <656E3D05-11B6-437B-B171-4894811A70CB.ref@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nathan Whitehorn nwhitehorn at FreeBSD.org wrote on
Sat Mar 6 02:01:30 UTC 2021 :

>     Restore /boot/efi to mtree.
>    =20
>     Instead of whether /boot/efi exists, which it now always does, =
including
>     on systems that don't and can't use EFI, use whether /boot/efi is
>     present in fstab to signal to the installer that it is a valid ESP =
and
>     should be configured. This has essentially the same semantics, but =
allows
>     /boot/efi to be created unconditionally.
>=20

Sounds like the documentation about /etc/fstab content
should indicate the special/reserved /boot/efi usage
context, be that comments in initial default files or
whatever.

I wonder if anyone puts / at the end in an fstab: /boot/efi/=20

=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?656E3D05-11B6-437B-B171-4894811A70CB>