From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 22:59:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA1516A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09DA13C46B for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2007 17:59:58 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,158,1167627600"; d="scan'208"; a="383271226:sNHT26746192" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id IBK42659; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:59:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2007 17:59:55 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:59:42 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090204.45A179AB.00B1,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Cc: Subject: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:59:58 -0000 Mark Lu writes: > So, why is there a move to find a replacement or something? > Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being old > if it works, right? As I understand the discussion: among others, because there are features people want to add that don't fit in the current model. (Personally, I think there are also points where the correct user behavior is not intuitively obvious.) Robert Huff