From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 3 08:20:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DAB16A416; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3954443D5E; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:20:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.47] (S0106001372fd1e07.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.9.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA38KeEE028531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:20:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <454AFBD1.7000503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:20:33 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vd@FreeBSD.org References: <200611030351.kA33peWQ061783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061103061317.GB64699@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org> <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454AE6B2.70702@FreeBSD.org> <20061103070602.GA65515@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454AEF2B.1000007@FreeBSD.org> <20061103080328.GA73249@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <20061103080328.GA73249@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mpatrol Makefile ports/devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:20:44 -0000 Vasil Dimov wrote: >> If somebody has sneaked its own definition into Porters Handbook I can't >> care less. > > I would not call this sneaking. How would you call it if somebody commits something that is against current practice without getting majority signing in? I can just easy to back out this paragraph as it went in, so what? I suspect that nobody would notice. >> It is not official unless majority of active porters agree >> upon it. > > You want a vote or what? > > I really believe this discussion is going nowhere. It is not going nowhere. You are trying to enforce some rules that you have no right to enforce. And that the whole point of this discussion. I am sorry, but but the fact that somebody committed some questionable words into porters handbook doesn't mean that it's official. -Maxim