From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jun 1 14:55:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06748 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu (joelh@diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA06741 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) id RAA32461; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:55:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:55:22 -0400 Message-Id: <199706012155.RAA32461@diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <10785.865140591@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: Borland 16bit bcc vs cc/gcc (float) From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> I wonder if there would be any chance of shipping K&R 2ed in soft form >> with the system? It's my favoured reference 8) > >As much as I like the "old testament", I have to say that the "new >testament" (H&S) is simply a better book. More in-depth examples, >a lighter style, broader coverage. Erm. Just better. :-) > I thought that 2ed was NT? -- http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu All my opinions are my own, not the Free Software Foundation's. Second law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped