From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Apr 19 6:49:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail19a.dulles19-verio.com (mail19a.dulles19-verio.com [161.58.134.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A780D37B416 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 06:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 198.104.176.109 (198.104.176.109) by mail19a.dulles19-verio.com (RS ver 1.0.63s) with SMTP id 064196744; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 09:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CC0201C.E32A0CA2@pythonemproject.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 06:48:12 -0700 From: rob X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger Cc: perky@fallin.lv, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: icc-compiled Python References: <200204190930.g3J9UET0000796@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Loop-Detect: 1 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sorry I missed the beginning of the thread. Is this Icc Python faster than the normal one? I am wondering as I've found FreeBSD Python 2.1 to be 1/2 the speed of the ActiveState Windows version on Win2k, using Numeric Python. This was using an FDTD benchmark and a Romberg variable width integration benchmark. Rob. Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On 19 Apr, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > > > I compiled python using each of gcc and icc. > > Great. Do you have any patches do do it in an automated way? > > > (on compiling with icc, I compiled 6 sources with gcc by hand > > to avoid icc's error hehe.) > > Which files and which errors? > > > Tests: per run per oper. overhead > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Which CPU? > > > icc ConcatStrings: 394.49 ms 2.63 us 1.56 m > > gcc ConcatStrings: 246.33 ms 1.64 us 1.95 m > > icc ConcatUnicode: 499.96 ms 3.33 us 1.56 m > > gcc ConcatUnicode: 369.77 ms 2.47 us 2.34 m > > > icc StringMappings: 535.74 ms 4.25 us 1.56 m > > gcc StringMappings: 315.66 ms 2.51 us 2.34 m > > > icc StringSlicing: 231.56 ms 1.32 us 1.95 m > > gcc StringSlicing: 191.72 ms 1.10 us 2.34 m > > > icc UnicodeSlicing: 274.41 ms 1.57 us 2.34 m > > gcc UnicodeSlicing: 233.87 ms 1.34 us 2.73 m > > Any chance the files you compiled with gcc instead of icc are related to > those tests? > > Bye, > Alexander. > > -- > The computer revolution is over. The computers won. > > http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net > GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message -- ----------------------------- The Numeric Python EM Project www.pythonemproject.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message