From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 7 14:06:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AB416A420 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:06:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C98B43D45 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:06:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so1468903wra for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:06:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ln/bfZV4UeEqb78BRc0Jou0gPviHWy5X15c1VJDuVIKTCjWshtw3Kx1jStepkjKM9qDWzOLBUERcDMl5Yao2sSFu0f6nJnqb0HJMDd4OirJLF2dOaaDklGC6tzTqe42t6au/jLQ9JGYbzBQ9EY2wqDXv9kExvWbJZAu7ViXeliQ= Received: by 10.54.132.19 with SMTP id f19mr8782570wrd; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.80.18 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:06:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:06:44 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk Sender: sem.bsd@gmail.com To: Frank Laszlo In-Reply-To: <43E8A5DD.5000509@vonostingroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060207003529.GA32317@hades.panopticon> <43E8A5DD.5000509@vonostingroup.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_DOS2UNIX may be more powerful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Matveychuk List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:06:47 -0000 2006/2/7, Frank Laszlo : > > Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > > > If the idea gets accepted, I'll make patches. > > > > > > Sounds like a pretty reasonable idea. But I think USE_* is generally > just on/off switches, so maybe it needs to be a different name? > > We already have USE_*=3Dlist. E.g. USE_GNOME, USE_RCORDER etc. But I think using of something like DOS2UNIX_FILES name will be better in the case. 2Dmitry: patches are always welcome. -- Sem.