Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 02:23:42 +0100 From: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Modular fetch design proposal: Was: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg Message-ID: <57229fdd-d664-3578-701e-c3121bee26a7@rlwinm.de> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ7iieQPvTqg0Wxfi8va7Z2NcOh-nnAVTRG5scA7zNvBXQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20220120142519.a5juoe75oppmnyby@aniel.nours.eu> <f1aca07d3cedd30b9a1df6624e950ffb@bsdforge.com> <e10f85c4-ed28-4475-bcbf-d4e572a6b954@FreeBSD.org> <d284c4d5d415fc17d3d7fbed354ddc77@bsdforge.com> <c93d717c-a62e-44ab-b5bf-f109810d65c4@FreeBSD.org> <a517d06c2faeed9883d5da787e4307ed@bsdforge.com> <DEF3FF17-5F38-4E1E-A55C-7E7472826AB9@punkt.de> <c36969e9fdd1772788562a06f4d53189@bsdforge.com> <dd853a98-b2af-4813-1f22-0c99598238d8@rlwinm.de> <CAOjFWZ7iieQPvTqg0Wxfi8va7Z2NcOh-nnAVTRG5scA7zNvBXQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24.01.22 16:37, Freddie Cash wrote: > Isn't that just reinventing libfetch which is already in the base install? My proposal is about empowering users to hook in their own loosely fetch helpers instead of implementing a common API to fetch from a handful of preselected URL schemas, but it would make sense to include a libfetch based helper for the protocols implemented by libfetch as part of pkg if only to make sure my design is powerful enough and not to hard to implement.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57229fdd-d664-3578-701e-c3121bee26a7>