From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 20 19:22:21 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA01287 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 19:22:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (root@spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA01282 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 19:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA19697; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 11:21:11 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199611210321.LAA19697@spinner.DIALix.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: "John S. Dyson" cc: smp@csn.net (Steve Passe), ccsanady@friley216.res.iastate.edu, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vm_page_alloc(ZERO): missing pages... In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Nov 1996 21:47:14 EST." <199611210247.VAA02697@dyson.iquest.net> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 11:21:10 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "John S. Dyson" wrote: > > > > if it happens with only 1 processor running I would think it rules out the tlb > > theory... > > > Is the SMP code totally sync'ed with -current? There was a severe problem > in earlier versions (and could have manifest the problem that you > describe.) vm_page.c had the problem. > > John I agree - it is looking much more like the VM problem.. The smp code has not recently been sync'ed with -current (like: 6-8 weeks ago), I'm in the middle of that right at the moment.. Cheers, -Peter