From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 7 02:09:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA15706 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 02:09:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from baerle.indra.de (baerle.indra.de [193.158.1.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA15684 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 02:09:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from deuerl@baerle.indra.de) Received: (from deuerl@localhost) by baerle.indra.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09824; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 11:04:51 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from deuerl) From: Robert Deuerling Message-Id: <199802071004.LAA09824@baerle.indra.de> Subject: Re: bug in ifconfig ? In-Reply-To: <19980207111341.20019@freebie.lemis.com> from Greg Lehey at "Feb 7, 98 11:13:41 am" To: grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 11:04:50 +0100 (MET) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe questions" Hi guys :-) just an update .... ifconfig shows: inet 193.158.1.137 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 193.158.1.137 netstat -rn shows: 193.158.1.137 193.158.1.137 UH 0 0 vx0 => ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ 193.158.1.137/32 link#1 so here's the bug ;) no alias is really made... FIX: I deleted the route added by ifconfig... and voila, everythings ok... I can ping the address.. so.. seems to be a bug ;) -> already sent an PR -Robert > On Fri, 6 February 1998 at 11:53:58 +0100, Robert Deuerling wrote: > > Hello :-) > > > > can somebody please check if there's a bug in ifconfig ? > > > > the problem is: doing a: > > > > ifconfig vx0 alias X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffffff > > > > ifconfig -a shows an entry for this item. > > That means it is in the kernel configuration. Why don't *you* show > what ifconfig says? > > > BUT: no ping is succcessful > > > > kernelmsgs show: > > > > arpresolv: can't allocate llinfo for X.X.X.X > > > > any idea ? > > Yes. Show us the details. > > Greg >