From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 1 03:34:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466C0106564A; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 03:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C2D8FC13; Sun, 1 Jan 2012 03:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q013YCkI062798; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:34:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q013YCcN062797; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:34:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:34:12 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Ed Schouten , Andreas Tobler , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120101033412.GB62729@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201112291441.pBTEfI8l060127@svn.freebsd.org> <4EFCA6A6.6080103@FreeBSD.org> <20111229183213.GK1895@hoeg.nl> <20111229184934.GA47885@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20111229192359.GM1895@hoeg.nl> <20120101025422.GD94452@zim.MIT.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120101025422.GD94452@zim.MIT.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: svn commit: r228955 - head/include X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 03:34:16 -0000 On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 09:54:22PM -0500, David Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011, Ed Schouten wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > * Steve Kargl , 20111229 19:49: > > > Are you going to submit a bug report to GCC? Because, as of now, > > > you've broken my ability to do development work on bleeding edge > > > freebsd and bleeding edge gcc. > > > > Here you go: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 > > > > In the future, could you write such bug reports yourself? I am really > > not that interested in GCC's development process. > > I'm out of town and don't remember the details of this, but is there a > reason we couldn't simply have an appropriate #ifdef that uses > __attribute((__noreturn__)) instead of [[noreturn]]? We have plenty > of ifdefs in the tree already to work around deficiencies in various > compilers. Saying "it's the compiler's fault and we're not going to > work around it" is a significant departure from historical precedent, > and it punishes the wrong people. Easier than arguing with the GNU > folks about fixing it, too... I've already sent a patch to GCC to work around the problem. FreeBSD is still considered to be a primary platform for GCC, so problem is a P1 issue in bugzilla. Unfortunately, I think that there are no active FreeBSD gcc maintainer. This means the patch may linger in bugzilla for awhile. -- Steve