From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 22:30:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8AD16A402 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17A013C45E for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m1NMU4rR052659 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:30:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m1NMU4Bn052654; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:30:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:30:04 GMT Message-Id: <200802232230.m1NMU4Bn052654@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Cc: Subject: Re: kern/120989: [udf] UDF (with DVD RAM) isn't mountable/readable X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andriy Gapon List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:30:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/120989; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andriy Gapon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, oliver@akephalos.de Cc: Scott Long Subject: Re: kern/120989: [udf] UDF (with DVD RAM) isn't mountable/readable Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:24:21 +0200 CC: Mark Linimon: no, it's not related. As a maintainer of sysutils/udfclient port and a guy who spent a lot of time on in-kernel UDF FS, I can tell that this problem is caused by FreeBSD fs/udf supporting only older UDF standards. Newer UDF features (>=2.00), like extended file entries, are not supported. So, I am not sure how to qualify this PR: a bug, a feature request, or ... One thing is for sure: FreeBSD UDF fs doesn't get attention that it actually needs. -- Andriy Gapon