From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Oct 17 17:47:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F07E41B01; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0592777485; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n22so1754620uaj.13; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:47:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=/WSqo2HD5t05nfvW4QuQT+j3ZL6qkk85z0PvtXZTQsE=; b=L4EH3GtV2mOLGhW2FDEheYggGhAvk/mgGiyrE05Dtj0ni0pmjCIR3kEe8I2kQJ+vRX 64v+/zVAc+QI+GjQf9x6/IaX0E3IqN5sz+oLGtns6iWfldog5mIlTfzmwr2P/Nn34Y0n m+Bm/wYTp1JzTJlG9xTpOKFsuuSUIU9Ws0e+uS75OHJTXAWcSQV9/UIkIuAJlmjGNObk Cv+HXP8dvUjo26CfgzeyTeow7afoPeGNmwx/fNUv7+KD4A6f4mCjjR6054G7anUJ3/ti bMUQAPmVqzxe4UBd3p7ODJJe/EpNweFucbLgGG4J1t4Eo2ZHoMvJ/6NitXC2miLFHOrl GhEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/WSqo2HD5t05nfvW4QuQT+j3ZL6qkk85z0PvtXZTQsE=; b=cekfhmele6kh1XaRiW7mA1XaBujMx+uSH1snzBvkSHQBaMbCP06p4JLEFoIzAZGC/C sItXNpaLfgmBVNAMKCbDqt4l9xXbvnOdFt7YPgjy8u5vcEX+iVFqugGSKClfyjp4yJ81 m975y31xu7PX4Kj6cyFH9g/i5+q4yGdTSAgTELSPMEu32Gu+XHlI1qnTHoCl0HsVXzxY 1Ntd+0/tPOGYcXSsiH3xxhJZosLHsdNqIUEZABEP3+MuxKp/JJgOardJJjIEQ0dHRDfi 2Sg/K5wDywRepi/I3PEBwiIz/fTtslckVwZeCrY+w98a7nIsjynhRPwUALgjVW+C0JaO YQyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaU5b3BnR2zZVNh1BszpDk3umEX7VX1HdZEgULXEY6jxiQQlmNoY XwUZ5ik/WFWusTbhs/EBnUWrAJD8k/1BbOFPeYcQFUBL X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDhNwin/aB/lzj4qE0a1DU4L8Pjtm+ooOavPtQfQMbafi8QkP228hvw0u+2rj3Li01xonsE7F8P2d0+agNZ5PQ= X-Received: by 10.176.27.108 with SMTP id n44mr10599633uai.47.1508262461830; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.85.8 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171017165708.GE1214@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <201710170627.v9H6R0XC078179@slippy.cwsent.com> <20171017125829.GA35718@albert.catwhisker.org> <20171017165708.GE1214@albert.catwhisker.org> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:47:41 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: P5N3C-5PjC9XRL5w7XzeCIThGSE Message-ID: Subject: Re: cve-2017-13077 - WPA2 security vulni To: "current@freebsd.org" , Allan Jude , FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:47:43 -0000 On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:57 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:51:23PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote: > > .... > > > Question: Should one expect a wpa_supplicant-2.6_2 executable built > > > under FreeBSD stable/11 (amd64) to work on the same hardware, but > > > running head? > > > > Did you run the version from ports, or did you run the base /etc/rc.d > > script with your rc.conf set to point to the ports binary? This will run > > the command with -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf overriding the ports > default. > > > > So this is expected to work in this way. > > Ah. When I installed the port, I was reminded: > > | ... > | ===> Registering installation for wpa_supplicant-2.6_2 > | Installing wpa_supplicant-2.6_2... > | To use the ports version of WPA Supplicant instead of the base, add: > | > | wpa_supplicant_program="/usr/local/sbin/wpa_supplicant" > | > | to /etc/rc.conf > | > | ===> SECURITY REPORT: > | .... > > So I did that. I did not do anything to the existing > /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant, which had been installed as part of base > FreeBSD. > > > .... > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > Unsubstantiated claims of "Fake News" are evidence that the claimant lies > again. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. > Possibly silly question, but are any of the defaults for the port different from those on the base system? DEBUG_* seem most likely to differ, but I'd like to know if there are any others. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683