From owner-freebsd-small Wed Jan 10 14:11:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1837B6A0 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:11:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0AMBBS48285 for small@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:11:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200101102211.f0AMBBS48285@iguana.aciri.org> Subject: sash as a shell replacement ? To: small@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:11:11 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, i have been trying to use "sash" as a replacement for "sh" and other utilities, but it seems problematic. Basically, sash does not handle things like sh some_script_name [ arguments ] nor can be invoked with a different name to implement one of the embedded commands. Does anyone else have a better experience, or can suggest some patches ? cheers luigi ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Luigi RIZZO, luigi@iet.unipi.it . ACIRI/ICSI (on leave from Univ. di Pisa) http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . 1947 Center St, Berkeley CA 94704 Phone: (510) 666 2927 ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message