From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Mar 29 23:44:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F27D37B71A for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:44:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from haribeau@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 2269 invoked by uid 0); 30 Mar 2001 07:44:43 -0000 Received: from pd902534b.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO l5zy6) (217.2.83.75) by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 30 Mar 2001 07:44:43 -0000 Message-ID: <004f01c0b8ed$4874fbc0$fe78a8c0@espe.de> From: "Clemens Hermann" To: Cc: "Colin Campbell" , References: <002c01c0b8e9$465f10e0$fe78a8c0@espe.de> <3AC4350F.3BD8D692@i-clue.de> Subject: Re: redundant servers Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:44:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Christoph, > rsync, cpdup or even tar over NFS gets all the other stuff updated in a cron job. is there no way of a live-file-mirroring? In case of a cron I will alwas have some inconsistence. The better ist gets (shorter replication intervals) the more it will get a performance problem. Gan't I get something to run like NFS but the "server should be on both ends" so that eiter one can fail? bye /ch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message