From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 15 11:33:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6556A37B418 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:33:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@ptavv.es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7FIX7R05493; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108151833.f7FIX7R05493@ptavv.es.net> To: "Gabriel Bastidas" Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: about freebsd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:50:41 CDT." Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:33:07 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: "Gabriel Bastidas" > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:50:41 -0500 > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > freeBSD is highly stable as Linux is ? Trick question? Troll? A definition of stable that I am not familiar with? I'm afraid that to answer this question in any way would accept the claim that Linux is "highly stable" and I really can't make any such statement. I can say that FreeBSD is highly stable by most any definition I am aware of. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message