Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:33:07 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: "Gabriel Bastidas" <gabriel7_99@hotmail.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: about freebsd Message-ID: <200108151833.f7FIX7R05493@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:50:41 CDT." <F124LQoOuDdHd6z6BJ800008a01@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: "Gabriel Bastidas" <gabriel7_99@hotmail.com> > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:50:41 -0500 > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > freeBSD is highly stable as Linux is ? Trick question? Troll? A definition of stable that I am not familiar with? I'm afraid that to answer this question in any way would accept the claim that Linux is "highly stable" and I really can't make any such statement. I can say that FreeBSD is highly stable by most any definition I am aware of. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108151833.f7FIX7R05493>