Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:02:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237372] [NEW PORT] textproc/elasticsearch7: Full-text search engine for Java Message-ID: <bug-237372-7788-nIGuHPQ0qB@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237372-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237372-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237372 --- Comment #1 from rlwestlund@gmail.com --- Is the maintainer-feedback flag never supposed to be used for new port proposals, then? I thought it would be reasonable to set it since feld@freebsd.org was listed as the maintainer for elasticsearch6. Also, I noticed that when you chaged the title you took out the [patch] thi= ng. According to https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/pr-wri= ting.html I'm supposed to put that in the title if I have a patch. Is my patch bad? D= id I submit it wrong? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237372-7788-nIGuHPQ0qB>