From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 23:46:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD4016A41B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Danovitsch@vitsch.net) Received: from VM01.Vitsch.net (vm01.vitsch.net [85.17.51.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC7013C461 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Danovitsch@vitsch.net) Received: from [192.168.45.230] (dhcp-077-250-050-082.chello.nl [77.250.50.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by VM01.Vitsch.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m03Nl0oV099922; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:47:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Danovitsch@vitsch.net) From: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" Organization: Vitsch Electronics To: Markus Boelter Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:46:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801032352.56491.Danovitsch@vitsch.net> <20080103233019.GE17445@rebooten.de> In-Reply-To: <20080103233019.GE17445@rebooten.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801040046.25465.Danovitsch@vitsch.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mksnap_ffs time X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:47:00 -0000 On Friday 04 January 2008 00:30:20 you wrote: > Hi! > > > 1) Is anyone else seeing this? > > As far as I know, this is somehow related to the SoftUpdates, but I am not > 100% sure. Look at the mailinglist archives, there was a discussion a few > months ago about the same topic as far as I remember. > > Please note that according to > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/snapshots.html > a filesystem can only have 20 snapshots! :-) Hmm.. Then at least time spent per snapshot isn't going to get much worse than it is today ;-) Too bad this limitation isn't mentioned in 'man 8 mksnap_ffs'. If this limitation is still there, I think it deserves a place in the manual. Thanks! -- Daan