From owner-freebsd-security Sun May 21 21:38:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A37A37BAAA for ; Sun, 21 May 2000 21:38:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04469; Sun, 21 May 2000 22:38:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA92094; Sun, 21 May 2000 22:37:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200005220437.WAA92094@harmony.village.org> To: cjclark@home.com Subject: Re: The procfs Hole in 2.2.8-STABLE? Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 May 2000 14:08:47 EDT." <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> References: <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 22:37:11 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> "Crist J. Clark" writes: : Am I to take it that 2.2.8-STABLE would be vulnerable? The following Yes. There are many vulnerabilities that were fixed in 3.x that haven't been back ported to 2.x. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message