From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 23 13:13:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF88716A46E for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A947B13C448 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F395190F for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:13:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:13:44 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070323131344.7f350a8d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200703222305.l2MN5pM3000691@anna.ana.com> References: <823E470A-93A8-4B6B-899A-E337FB75CABD@goldmark.org> <200703222305.l2MN5pM3000691@anna.ana.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Summary: Tell portupgrade to use passive ftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:13:49 -0000 On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:05:51 -0700 (PDT) eps+ques0703@ana.com (Eric P. Scott) wrote: > [Jeffrey Goldberg] > >As an aside, I'd like to rant that there is no reason for ftp to > >exist anymore. Sure it is stateful in a way that HTTP isn't, but > >that isn't enough to justify its continued use. > > I have very good connectivity to several FTP-only mirror sites, > and relatively poor connectivity to any that serve up HTTP. None > of those servers are under my administrative control. I think the implication was that servers should move from FTP to HTTP, not that FTP-only mirrors should be removed from the lists. I think it's happening, if you look at bsd.sites.mk there's more HTTP than there was a year or two ago. It's definately good to have the option of HTTP because some ISPs treat FTP as a file-sharing protocol.