Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:20:56 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 193484] [stage] textproc/refdb: Update port
Message-ID:  <bug-193484-13-FEP4u6iQXq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193484-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-193484-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193484

--- Comment #12 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #11)
> The fPIC lines (e.g "CFLAGS+=-fPIC") look suspicious.
> It's almost never unconditionally added and usually not necessary for amd64
> either (vendor configure script / makefile normally takes care of it)
> 
> The post-install commands shouldn't be masked either.
> 
> But this is definitely in-line with what I was expecting.


That was an indirect request for new submission and an explanation for -fPIC
which is most likely wrong.  It's not rhetorical.  This port is now one of only
3 remaining unstaged ports.  I was hoping I could commit a fix...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193484-13-FEP4u6iQXq>