From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 21:44:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C06A16A407 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: from dsl254-019-221.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (dsl254-019-221.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.19.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B19C813C484 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 59096 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2007 21:44:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Apr 2007 21:44:21 -0000 Message-ID: <46196235.7090108@zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:44:21 -0700 From: Joe Kelsey User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: relocation truncated to fit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:44:16 -0000 I have a problem reported to me in ports/111165 about ksh93 not compiling on the sparc64 platform due to the linker reporting "relocation truncated to fit". This is an error I have never seen. I know for a fact that it is not strictly a sparc64 platform issue as I have seen reference to it in relation to amd64. However, I have never seen a resolution of the problem.I believe that this is a gcc issue. How do I fix this? I cannot find any information in the Freebsd site about this mysterious error message. I know that ksh93 works on sparc64 because the ksh93 developers are working with Sun to install it as a default shell in Solaris 11. Therefore, it works with the Sun compiler. Why do I get this error on gcc? Any help would be greatly appreciated. /Joe