From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 5 20:28:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id ABC2F1065672; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:28:42 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:28:42 -0000 On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:57:45PM +0000, Doug Barton wrote: > New Revision: 305288 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/305288 > > Log: > Remove the word 'support' from most places that it occurs, since it is > not only redundant and repetitive, it makes the descriptions of some > options too long for RELENG_8. Removing it does not make the meaning of > the option description less clear. Yes it did. I would prefer this commit to be backed out. Before descriptions were readable and user friendly, now they are overly concise and could be confuring to non-hacker (read: normal users). ./danfe