From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 22:06:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73A3106567A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8940F8FC0C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE21208F; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:06:29 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Peter Jeremy References: <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080703170700.3b91b8c6@peedub.jennejohn.org> <20080703152551.GA73103@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net> <20080704213959.GA1706@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080705213500.GC29380@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:06:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20080705213500.GC29380@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> (Peter Jeremy's message of "Sun\, 6 Jul 2008 07\:35\:01 +1000") Message-ID: <86hca9pst7.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current , Sverre Svenningsen Subject: Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:06:30 -0000 Peter Jeremy writes: > Sverre Svenningsen wrote: > > Is current@freebsd.org just an alias to freebsd-current@freebsd.org ? > Yes. There are some MUAs that have broken list-handling functionality > and cannot be configured to recognize list aliases. Uh, no. No MUA can "recognize list aliases" as it would require knowledge of what software the receiving MX runs and how it is configured. No MUA needs to "recognize list aliases" either. As long as they reply to the address listed in the original email's From: field (and optionally to those listed in the Cc: field), they will be fine. The culprit here is HPS, who added freebsd-current@ to the Cc: list. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no