From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 15:36:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2CD106564A for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6198FC1B for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:36:35 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=pGIf9D v2077iodu558zvHG9r7XSgKLrZN/6+Lefb6bzNn3yxRZw5nO38QxKCRe7uKW+TpJ xlcZovhsarVwFdvyBefFU5J5i3XdeKDdSG8/eFfzMu+15shn+G6e+JCXmlSL2E/l V8aGiFySq9aP88rCC4wAQCWfE0Ax3BzUX4+2Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=JrzzmlwL8htz ceKE2u5zD8uQq/sSh9Og7oyhz031S2E=; b=H2+Ski/IiN93qZdMRUujXS6ApuM9 XJifaXPjxkFXnL8xyGdZ0QNSF7ghI79K1IsY+spTyzFg3lOfdxtoFZIsGFdjt5zH vRDyatWpLQO1qPr4TnAfiPBIfj68uueR8YTEnGsKQbFaGeE/XYdOzvBmnLfE/3a1 pGk1fjKRcoan050= Received: (qmail 91359 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2012 10:36:27 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.74?) (bryan@shatow.net@74.94.87.209) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 23 Aug 2012 10:36:27 -0500 Message-ID: <50364E0E.3090205@shatow.net> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:36:46 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1345697446.84337.11.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <20120823225855.U33776@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1345729674.52121.4.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20120824002504.L33776@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20120824002504.L33776@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable , re , Ian Smith , Ken Smith Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Available... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:36:36 -0000 On 8/23/2012 9:28 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:47:54 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 23:12 +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:50:46 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > > > > > > With both the doc and ports repositories now moved to SVN it has been > > > > decided to not export the 9.1 release branch activity to CVS. So > > > > csup/cvsup update mechanisms are not available for updating to 9.1-RC1. > > > > If you would like to use SVN the branch to use is releng/9.1. > > > > > > Assuming the stupid question is the one you didn't ask, just to clarify: > > > does this mean that c*sup won't work with these RCs in particular, or > > > that CVS is dead and SVN becomes mandatory from 9.1-RELEASE? > > > > > > cheers, Ian > > > > > > > The latter. If you are not using FreeBSD-Update to handle the updates > > of a machine you'll need to update your source tree using SVN for > > release branches (releng/*) from now on. Updates of the CVS repository > > will continue for the existing stable/* and head for now. I don't think > > anything has been decided on when that will stop. > > Thanks Ken. I'm a bit POLAxed; guess I don't read enough lists .. I'm a bit surprised too. Shouldn't this mean svn should be in base? If not, should csup come OUT of base? Bryan