From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 16:07:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF761065678; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16C68FC17; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaai10 with SMTP id i10so933768eaa.13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:07:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=i5BpQTkQRnzSqpADPecwtRz0MlN9w39sRZnFeEdDJcY=; b=s1AT0i00Si8neqkjhyY3b+/tv9ttlDOuoGk8l+mT6VwquTFEJtJxqyRkN1AwuUCo4y 3gYmN2FyvGzkWb8krFFQmnb8iBQ2ZAXeeCf1XOZOjRaV12Mqka/SerRbGpJ601IlXIH8 n3MaqeF36wNMo68wXzcbpwB3Iz/wxZaCVY/ow= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.28.1 with SMTP id k1mr4177764ebc.39.1326816465656; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:07:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.98.132 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:07:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F159530.3030306@freebsd.org> References: <4F159530.3030306@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:07:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: Thomas Zander To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis Subject: Re: Re: ports/164244: multimedia/mplayer: last update (1.0.r20111218) conflicts with devel/ncurses X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:07:47 -0000 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:35, Michael Scheidell wrote: > tell me you want me to revert this patch, and do a portepoch. > the solution would be for the submitter to work with the maintainer on a > solution, or am I supposed to fix this without reversing this? Let's all calm down first :-) Please don't do portepoch, it's ugly. I'll see that I submit a fix soon. Riggs