From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 5 06:04:03 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EFAFE4ABA for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB6672E17 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 00261FE4AB6; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3230FE4AB5 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84E1872E0C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E1A15959 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w85641W0070147 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w856414J070145 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:04:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166724] [re] if_re watchdog timeout Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:03:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ale@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: yongari@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:04:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166724 --- Comment #35 from Alex Dupre --- I don't think I've ever said this issue is good :-) What I said is that in my environment when I switched to 11.2-RELEASE it was happening less frequently. With the FreeBSD driver is easy to detect it, because it prints the timeout message and resets the interface after 5 tick= s, effectively interrupting any connections for a few seconds. The Realtek dri= ver doesn't reset the interface and doesn't print the message, so a short timeo= ut might go unnoticed. To add new info to the thread, recently I've tried to increase the watchdog timeout of the FreeBSD driver, changing it from 5 to 50 ticks. Well, the re= sult was that the connection interruption lasted longer, so the interface seems really stuck and the reset the only solution. In the last months I've also tried Realtek drivers 1.94.01 and 1.95 (the one I'm currently running) and I'm not seeing differences from the 1.93, in my scenario it seems to work good enough (=3D=3D I'm not able to detect any co= nnection drop during normal usage, that doesn't mean they are not happening at all). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=