From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 3 4:57:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fuggle.veldy.net (veldy-host201.dsl.visi.com [208.42.48.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA0B37BF42 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 04:57:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from veldy@fuggle.veldy.net) Received: by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 342C21948; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 07:01:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258A4193E; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 07:01:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 07:01:10 -0500 (CDT) From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: Nick Hibma Cc: Christopher Masto , Chuck Robey , FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have no real reason for including its functionality - I am as of yet - pretty much a perl novice. However, judging by the past, the C compiler upgrade is done in current - and I would think the perl upgrade would also be done in current. I would think you would want to track this sort of thing as closely as possible - unless there is an pending release - which there isn't. Users will follow current to get the latest and greatest - bleeding edge technology. Help test it. Seem to me the sooner it is done, the more thoroughly tested it will be. One year ought to be long enough :) Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Nick Hibma wrote: > > Are there actually any good reasons why we _should_ upgrade in the first > place? Security fixes, added functionality we require, etc. The perl we > have is stable and the problems it has are well known, which is good > enough in 99% of the cases. > > Including Perl in the make world build is something entirely different > from doing a make install /usr/ports, I'm sure. > > Nick > > > > > > Are there any plans to merge perl-5.6.0 into current? I don't have any > > > > plans for using it currently, but I curious. > > > > > > Hmm. What with the nightmarish build structure of perl, I'm sure that > > > reading this is just going to wreck Mark's day. In light of that, and in > > > the absence of both any real software that needs the upgrade, and > > > lack of confidence in a really squeaky new release, why don't we all grant > > > Mark a little slack on this, at least for a while. > > > > I've been running Perl 5 since before it was included with FreeBSD, and > > I've never noticed anything nightmarish about the build process. I > > tried 5.6 a couple of days ago, and it built and tested out of the > > box. > > -- > > Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications > > chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net > > > > Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > > > -- > n_hibma@webweaving.org > n_hibma@freebsd.org USB project > http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message