From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 10:21:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5EDD7FC; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [31.24.6.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2240AD8B; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Xg9lt-0008C4-Vn; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:01:02 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Xg9lt-0002yh-TT; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:01:01 +0100 To: bapt@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removal of legacy X.Org (aka non-WITH_NEW_XORG) In-Reply-To: <20141003083051.GA52332@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:01:01 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:21:01 -0000 ..... > Note official packages reflecting this sitation will start building on > Wednesday 8th of October and hit your mirrors as soon as possible for both > quarterly branch and regular head. Has this happened ? I was expecting to see an ATI UMS port appeat, and for the non UMS port to move to version 7, but have been checking and I still get this: $ pkg search xf86-video-ati xf86-video-ati-6.14.6_4 xf86-video-ati-ums-6.14.6_4 The version in the new xorg respsiotory is xf86-video-ati-7.2.0_4 - did I misunderstand what was changing, or is this delayed for some reason ? thanks, -pete.